Thursday, October 2. 2008 at 01:50 PM EDT 1 comment
With every new venture and idea born on the digital Web, the question is always the same: Will it make money? For many in the digital content space -- particularly online video and social networking -- that still remains to be seen.
Everyone, of course, claims to have the answer. Some say it's all about branded content, others say it's about changing user behavior. YouTube today unveiled post-roll ads on some of its short-form content (as expected).
But the dollars have yet to roll in. (Stuck in traffic, perhaps.)
Part of the problem with creating a revenue stream (and, with any luck, a profit), is that users visiting social networking sites or viewing online video just aren't looking out for ads. The other part of it stems from clueless advertisers that haphazardly slap ads on and around all things digital.
According to Romi Mahajan, chief marketing officer at Ascentium, an interactive marketing and technology consultancy, there are at least three things that online advertisers are doing wrong -- the first being that not enough advertisers are doing behavioral targeting. "Figure out who I am before you serve me advertising," he says. [Ed. note: Or, see Gmail ads for how not to behaviorally target.]
Read the rest at Internet Evolution.
Tags:
Comments

There will not be one method that works for everyone, or every situation. If the main method for monetizing the web is pre/mid/post roll ads then I'm not looking forward to the future of the web. A mid-roll ad works just fine if you're gonna sit down and watch a full episode of Lost, but to sit through a 30 second commercial to watch a 2 minute video on YouTube seems to be a bit much.
I think that we have to use the medium to it's full capacity. The web is a very interactive lanscape, so why are we limited to linear methods like pre/post ads? I might as well break out my old U-Matic deck edit station and start editing 3/4 inch tape to tape. The future of web video should revolve more around user interaction, directly in the video. If I'm watching a program and want to know more about a particular object, I should be able to click directly on it and be taken to the site. I do that with ads placed beside the video that catch my attention, why not be able to do that with the video or products in the video itself. And this is just one avenue of interaction. Check out some solutions here: http://www.permissiontv.com/products/players_applications
Aside from revenue genrated from ads, or click through ads, users have got to realize that the content has got to be paid for in some fasion. What would happen if youtube had two types of membership; one that is free that had 30 second pre-roll ads before every video, and one that cost $9.99 bucks a month but had no ads. I spend enough time on youtube that I would gladly pay 10 bucks a month to pay for bandwidth cost s but not have to watch a pre-roll a.
More from Nicole Ferraro
Friday, October 23. 2009 at 09:25 AM EDT 1 comment
Thursday, October 22. 2009 at 12:30 PM EDT 2 comments
Friday, August 14. 2009 at 01:40 PM EDT 1 comment
Friday, July 24. 2009 at 05:05 PM EDT 1 comment
All From Nicole Ferraro