SANTA CLARA, Calif. -- As consumers continue to tap the Internet to feed
their voracious appetites for video -- including high-end and high-def content --
today's all-you-can eat service model will have to shift to a consumption model
more typical in the mobile phone world.
At least that was one of the conclusions made last week by
MSO execs at a panel here at the first annual CableNEXT show.
"Video is going through a renaissance," said Michael Lee, the
chief strategy officer for Rogers Communications of Canada. "People are consuming
more and consuming it in different places, and consuming it in different
formats."
Cable, of course, should be a tad concerned that so-called
"over-the-top video" (or perhaps a "facilities-free" video
services provider) could sap revenues away from premium and VOD services. On
top of that, many new digital TVs come with Internet ports, giving those sets
access to video streams and movie downloads. With that in mind, should offering
a 100-Mbit/s solution based on Docsis 3.0 give the cable industry pause?
Sort of, but maybe not in the form one might expect.
Cable operators, said Charter Communications
chief technology officer Marwan Fawaz, will certainly have to boost broadband
speeds, but concerns are raised as the cost of that new infrastructure becomes
increasingly difficult to manage, particularly as Internet traffic grows at 50
percent year-to-year. At that rate, it's "not sustainable," he said,
for cable to continue to invest more equipment and support that growth with an
all-you-can-eat model.
"Eventually, we will go to a usage-based solution," Fawaz
predicted.
Rogers, for
one, is already trying such a model with an 18-Mbit/s speed tier. Lee said it's
a "relatively high cap," noting in a follow-up conversation that it's
in the neighborhood of 90-Gbytes per month.
"You can't keep absorbing costs in the process of delivering
it," Lee said of higher-speed tiers. "We need to move to a model that
aligns our cost with our revenue."
As HD Internet video enters the fold, it will only require more horsepower
on the network to support it.
Although consumption caps are targeted to a small group of power users,
introducing them does involve some risk, particularly in upsetting a small (but
very vocal) group of power users.
Comcast Corp. and its
so-called "invisible cap" is the most documented case of this. The
MSO has come under
fire not so much for applying a byte cap, but for not disclosing what the
threshold is. While customers complain in favor of Comcast disclosing that
number, the MSO argues that sharing it would open it up to potential abuse.
Previously, it has said that a small number of users (about 0.01 percent) go
beyond the consumption limit and that the MSO gives those customers an
opportunity to upgrade to a tier more in line with their usage patterns.
But cable operators are also starting to look at the potential of new Docsis
3.0-capable set-tops that bridge the traditional cable video world with one fed
by high-speed connections.
Ian Blaine, CEO of thePlatform (a media
publishing firm that's now part of Comcast), said his company is working with
its new corporate cousin to help the MSO "prepare for when those things
come together."
Although MSOs believe it's a question of when, not if, they will move to
consumption-based billing for broadband Internet services, the big question is
how consumers, which have grown accustomed to an all-you-can-eat model, will
react to this new paradigm, and how that will affect the over-the-top video
crowd.
Also, don't expect the recently
formed Network Neutrality
Squad to absorb that trend without a fight.